Krishna Janardhan Bhat

Go to Database Search Page

Go to Database Index Page

Charge:	"Fraud (passing bad checks, documents, casino, bankrupcy, etc.)"
Sentence:
Years Imprisoned:
Year Crime:
Year Convicted:
Year Cleared:	2008
U.S. State or Country of Crime:	India
County or Region of Crime:
City of Crime:
Result:	Judicially Exonerated
Summary of Case:	"Wrongly convicted of negotiating a bad check. He appealed his conviction, and the Indian Supreme Court set aside his conviction because the prosecution did did not produce any evidence to prove the existence of any debt or liability against Bhatt, or that the bad check was negotiated to falsely discharge a debt or liability as the law requires."
Conviction Caused By:
Innocence Proved By:	"The Indian Supreme Court set aside his conviction because the prosecution did did not produce any evidence to prove the existence of any debt or liability against Bhatt, or that the bad check was negotiated to falsely discharge a debt or liability as the law requires."
Defendant Aided By:
Compensation Awarded:
Was Perpetrator Identified?
Age When Imprisoned:
Age When Released:
Sex:	Male
Skin/Ethnicity:
Information Source 1:	"Section 138 of NI Act: Conviction only if cheque issued for discharge of debt, says SC, India Law News, January 13, 2008"
Information Location 1:	http://www.indlawnews.com/A18593A86222FFA22A7CBDBBB0F25485
Information Source 2:
Information Location 2:
Information Source 3:
Information Location 3:
Information Source 4:
Information Location 4:
Information Source 5:
Information Location 5:
Book About Case:
Book Information:
Book About Case (2):
Book Information (2):
Movie About Case:
Comments About Case:

Go to Database Search Page

Go to Database Index Page

Krishna Janardhan Bhat

Charge:

"Fraud (passing bad checks, documents, casino, bankrupcy, etc.)"

Sentence:

Years Imprisoned:

Year Crime:

Year Convicted:

Year Cleared:

2008

U.S. State or Country of Crime:

India

County or Region of Crime:

City of Crime:

Result:

Judicially Exonerated

Summary of Case:

Conviction Caused By:

Innocence Proved By:

"The Indian Supreme Court set aside his conviction because the prosecution did did not produce any evidence to prove the existence of any debt or liability against Bhatt, or that the bad check was negotiated to falsely discharge a debt or liability as the law requires."

Defendant Aided By:

Compensation Awarded:

Was Perpetrator Identified?

Age When Imprisoned:

Age When Released:

Sex:

Male

Skin/Ethnicity:

Information Source 1:

"Section 138 of NI Act: Conviction only if cheque issued for discharge of debt, says SC, India Law News, January 13, 2008"

Information Location 1:

http://www.indlawnews.com/A18593A86222FFA22A7CBDBBB0F25485

Information Source 2:

Information Location 2:

Information Source 3:

Information Location 3:

Information Source 4:

Information Location 4:

Information Source 5:

Information Location 5:

Book About Case:

Book Information:

Book About Case (2):

Book Information (2):

Movie About Case:

Comments About Case: