Wrongly Convicted Database Record

 

Go to Database Search Page

Go to  Database Index Page

Adam A. Holm

 

Charge:

Obstructing or interfering with lawful taking of wildlife or aquatic life

Sentence:

Years Imprisoned:

Year Crime:

2012

Year Convicted:

2013

Year Cleared:

2015

U.S. State or Country of Crime:

Illinois

County or Region of Crime:

Grundy

City of Crime:

Morris

Result:

Judicially Exonerated

Summary of Case:

"Adam A. Holm and his son Daniel Holm were codefendants wrongly convicted in 2013 of violating Illinois statute 720 ILCS 125/2(a) that applies to a person "[w]ilfully obstructs or interferes with the lawful taking of wildlife or aquatic life by another person with the specific intent to prevent that lawful taking." On December 2, 2012 Adam and Daniel made noise while on their grandmother's property that scared aware deer being hunted on adjoining land. The next day the two were charged with illegally interferring with the hunters. They both represented themselves. Adam was convicted after a jury trial in Grundy County Circuit Court, while Daniel pled guilty. Adam appealed his conviction. After pleading guilty Daniel hired private counsel, who moved to withdraw the plea, arguing that Daniel had committed no crime. Daniel appealed the denial of his motion by the trial judge. On December 8, 2014 the Illinois Court of Appeals vacated Adam's conviction on the basis he didn't commit a crime because, " The Act was intended to apply to people protesting at game preserves, clubs or public hunting grounds—trespassing—not to people legally using their own property." ('People v. Adam A. Holm, 2014 IL App (3d) 130582). The same day, December 8, 2014, the appeals court reversed the denial of Daniel's motion to withdraw his guilty plea on the basis that he didn't commit a crime, and remanded for his conviction to be vacated."

Conviction Caused By:

Erroneous interpretation of the law by the prosection and the trial judge.

Innocence Proved By:

"On December 8, 2014 the Illinois Court of Appeals vacated Adam's conviction on the basis he didn't commit a crime because, " The Act was intended to apply to people protesting at game preserves, clubs or public hunting grounds—trespassing—not to people legally using their own property." ('People v. Adam A. Holm, 2014 IL App (3d) 130582). The same day, December 8, 2014, the appeals court reversed the denial of Daniel's motion to withdraw his guilty plea on the basis that he didn't commit a crime, and remanded for his conviction to be vacated."

Defendant Aided By:

Compensation Awarded:

Was Perpetrator Identified?

Age When Imprisoned:

Age When Released:

Sex:

Male

Skin/Ethnicity:

White

Information Source 1:

"People v. Adam A. Holm, 2014 IL App (3d) 130582 (Vacating conviction on basis of insufficient evidence.)"

Information Location 1:

http://www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2014/3rdDistrict/3130582.pdf

Information Source 2:

Information Location 2:

Information Source 3:

Information Location 3:

Information Source 4:

Information Location 4:

Information Source 5:

Information Location 5:

Book About Case:

Book Information:

Book About Case (2):

Book Information (2):

Movie About Case:

Comments About Case:

Innocents Database Created and Maintained by Hans Sherrer innocents@forejustice.org

Hosted on forejustice.org and mirrored on justicedenied.org .