Wrongly Convicted Database Record
|
Charge: |
Incest |
Sentence: |
4-1/2 years |
Years Imprisoned: |
0.33 |
Year Crime: |
2006 |
Year Convicted: |
2008 |
Year Cleared: |
2009 |
U.S. State or Country of Crime: |
Australia |
County or Region of Crime: |
Queensland |
City of Crime: |
|
Result: |
Judicially Exonerated |
Summary of Case: |
"Barry Allan Rose was wrongly convicted on October 16, 2008 of six counts of incest with the daughter of Rose's long-time girlfriend. The girl was considered an adult of legal age to consent to sexual relations and marry when all six alleged incidents occurred: three in 2006 when she was 17-years-old and three in 2007 when she was 18. After his conviction following a jury trial, Rose was sentenced to 4-1-2 years in prison. Rose appealed is sentence as "manifestly escessive." During the hearing on February 9, 2009 in Queensland's Court of Appeal on that application, the Court expressed concern about the guilty verdicts because of the terms of s 222(8) Criminal Code 1899 (Qld), and the question of whether it applied to his alleged conduct. Rose's case was adjourned to allow him the opportunity to apply for an extension of time to appeal against his convictions. On Febuary 19, 2009 the appeals court heard Rose's application and granted him an extension of time to file an appeal, allowed his appeal, quashed his convictions on the basis he wasn't 'lawfully married' to the girl's mother so he didn't commit incest, and reserved its decision as to whether a re-trial should be ordered on any count. Rose was released on bond after 4 months in custody. On April 9, 2009 the appeals court issued its written ruliing that: "No retrial should be ordered on any count. Instead, a verdict of acquittal on each count should be entered."" |
Conviction Caused By: |
|
Innocence Proved By: |
"On Febuary 19, 2009 the appeals court heard Rose's application and granted him an extension of time to file an appeal, allowed his appeal, quashed his convictions on the basis he wasn't 'lawfully married' to the girl's mother so he didn't commit incest, and reserved its decision as to whether a re-trial should be ordered on any count. Rose was released on bond after 4 months in custody. On April 9, 2009 the appeals court issued its written ruliing that: "No retrial should be ordered on any count. Instead, a verdict of acquittal on each count should be entered."" |
Defendant Aided By: |
|
Compensation Awarded: |
|
Was Perpetrator Identified? |
|
Age When Imprisoned: |
|
Age When Released: |
|
Sex: |
Male |
Skin/Ethnicity: |
|
Information Source 1: |
R v. Rose [2009] QCA 83 (9 April 2009) |
Information Location 1: |
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QCA/2009/83.html |
Information Source 2: |
|
Information Location 2: |
|
Information Source 3: |
|
Information Location 3: |
|
Information Source 4: |
|
Information Location 4: |
|
Information Source 5: |
|
Information Location 5: |
|
Book About Case: |
|
Book Information: |
|
Book About Case (2): |
|
Book Information (2): |
|
Movie About Case: |
|
Comments About Case: |
Innocents Database Created and Maintained by Hans Sherrer innocents@forejustice.org